Integrating Northeast India for inclusive education

India often celebrates its diversity as a civilisational strength. Yet, diversity must be taught to be understood — and understood to be respected. The persistent racial discrimination faced by Northeast people is not merely a social aberration; it reflects a deeper structural issue: educational invisibility. When citizens from Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Assam, Tripura and Sikkim migrate to other states of India for education or employment, many face racial stereotyping and social exclusion.

The tragic killing of Nido Taniam in 2014 was not merely a crime — it was a symptom of a deeper societal disconnect. The M.P. Bezbaruah Committee recognised the need for sensitisation and awareness. Yet, a decade later, incidents of racial abuse continue to happen. In December 2025, Anjel Chakma from Tripura was attacked and killed under similar circumstances. The recent incident of racial abuse against three young women from Northeast India in Delhi has again reopened wounds.

Yet, for a majority of schoolchildren across India, the Northeast remains a footnote — a small shaded patch on the map, detached from the mainstream narrative of Indian civilisation. This curricular invisibility feeds social ignorance. And ignorance, left unchallenged, mutates into racism.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous Northeastern people reported being called “coronavirus” or “Chinese”, facing discrimination, workplace bias and street harassment. In universities across metropolitan India, students from the Northeast report:

• Being mocked for physical features.
• Stereotyping of Northeastern women.
• Exclusion from student networks.

A 2014 survey by the North East Support Centre & Helpline (NESC&H) found that 78% of Northeastern respondents in Delhi had experienced racial discrimination. This is not merely about slurs. It is about systemic invisibility.

Racial bias extends into workplaces. Northeastern professionals often report:

• Accent bias in interviews.
• Stereotyping into limited sectors.
• Toxic behaviour or expressions by individuals or groups
• Underrepresentation in boardrooms and senior bureaucracy.

Corporate India tracks gender diversity — but rarely ethnic diversity.

Root cause is the curriculum gap: What India doesn’t teach

Our national curriculum devotes extensive chapters to the Indus Valley, the Mauryas, the Mughals, and the freedom struggle in northern and western India. But how often do we mention the story of Lachit Borphukan, the Ahom general who defeated the Mughals at the Battle of Saraighat in 1671, effectively halting Mughal expansion into Assam? His strategic brilliance is studied in military institutions, yet rarely emphasised in national school curricula.

How many children learn about Kanaklata Barua, the 17-year-old Assamese freedom fighter shot while leading a Quit India procession in 1942? Or about Rani Gaidinliu, who resisted British rule and endured long imprisonment?

These are not regional stories; they are national stories. When history is incomplete, identity becomes fragmented.

The Northeast is central to India’s Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific vision. The Siliguri Corridor — barely 22 km wide at its narrowest — connects the region to central India. NE is home to immense hydropower potential (estimated at over 50,000 MW), oil and natural gas reserves in Assam, and globally recognised tea production. Yet many students across India remain unaware of this importance. Comprehensive geographical education is essential for developing an informed understanding of national security and strategic priorities

Traditional dresses from the Northeast are powerful examples of intricate weaving, sustainability, and bold aesthetics. At a time when global fashion is shifting toward handcrafted, ethical textiles, these traditions are market-ready for international platforms. Design institutes and fashion curricula should incorporate Northeastern textile studies, encouraging collaboration between artisans and global designers. Economic empowerment follows cultural recognition.

The social fabric of Northeast India reflects a cultural ethos in which women’s participation in public life, commerce, and professional spheres is not viewed as exceptional but as expected and respected. A woman’s personal liberty and self-determination are deeply valued in the northeast culture. The all-women market of Ima Keithel in Manipur is one of the largest and oldest of its kind in Asia — a living example of female-led commerce. Women from the region have excelled in sports, arts, civil services, and entrepreneurship, challenging patriarchal stereotypes. Highlighting such examples in gender studies reshapes national narratives around empowerment.

Learning from global models

Countries facing internal diversity challenges have used curriculum reform as a strategic tool. Canada systematically integrates Indigenous histories into national education to address historical marginalisation. New Zealand embeds the Māori language and heritage into mainstream schooling. South Africa restructured textbooks post-apartheid to promote inclusive nationhood.

India can similarly adopt a structured framework: mandatory curriculum modules on Northeast history and geography at the secondary level, inclusion of regional literature in language syllabi, and experiential exposure through student exchange programmes.

India’s strength lies not only in its diversity, but in how well it understands that diversity.

Integrating Northeast history, geography, culture and economic potential into the national curriculum is a high-impact intervention for long-term cohesion.

END OF ARTICLE